Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clin Imaging ; 90: 71-77, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1906895

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of barotrauma (pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema) in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. To describe the chest radiography patterns of barotrauma and understand the development in relation to mechanical ventilation and patient mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 363 patients with COVID-19 from March 1 to April 8, 2020. Primary outcomes were pneumomediastinum or subcutaneous emphysema with or without pneumothorax, pneumoperitoneum, or pneumoretroperitoneum. The secondary outcomes were length of intubation and death. In patients with pneumomediastinum and/or subcutaneous emphysema, we conducted an imaging review to determine the timeline of barotrauma development. RESULTS: Forty three out of 363 (12%) patients developed barotrauma radiographically. The median time to development of either pneumomediastinum or subcutaneous emphysema was 2 days (IQR 1.0-4.5) after intubation and the median time to pneumothorax was 7 days (IQR 2.0-10.0). The overall incidence of pneumothorax was 28/363 (8%) with an incidence of 17/43 (40%) in the barotrauma cohort and 11/320 (3%) in those without barotrauma (p ≤ 0.001). In total, 257/363 (71%) patients died with an increase in mortality in those with barotrauma 33/43 (77%) vs. 224/320 (70%). When adjusting for covariates, barotrauma was associated with increased odds of death (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.25-7.17). CONCLUSION: Barotrauma is a frequent complication of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. In comparison to intubated COVID-19 patients without barotrauma, there is a higher rate of pneumothorax and an increased risk of death.


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Subcutaneous Emphysema , Barotrauma/complications , Barotrauma/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Mediastinal Emphysema/epidemiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Subcutaneous Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Subcutaneous Emphysema/epidemiology , Subcutaneous Emphysema/etiology
2.
Chest ; 162(1): e19-e25, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1906854

ABSTRACT

CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old Puerto Rican woman, with a known but inconclusive diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) since 2002 and recent moderate COVID-19, is now presenting with subacute worsening dyspnea on exertion. The patient had sporadic medical care over the years for her ILD (Table 1). Prior workup included chest CT imaging with a "crazy-paving" pattern of lung disease, as defined by ground-glass opacity with superimposed interlobular septal thickening and visible intralobular lines. Bronchoscopy showed normal airway examination, and BAL revealed clear fluid with foamy macrophages and negative cultures. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and transbronchial biopsy specimens both showed foamy macrophages. Results of pulmonary function testing (PFT) revealed an isolated gas transfer defect on diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco). She had lived with mild yet nonprogressive functional impairment and stable exercise intolerance over these years. She was then hospitalized for COVID-19 in August 2020 and for recurrent shortness of breath in September 2020. She now presented 4 months following her September 2020 hospitalization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/pathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/pathology , Middle Aged , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
3.
Crit Care Explor ; 3(3): e0355, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1114876

ABSTRACT

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is the major complication of coronavirus disease 2019, yet optimal respiratory support strategies are uncertain. We aimed to describe outcomes with high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and identify individual factors associated with noninvasive respiratory support failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study to describe rates of high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and/or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation success (live discharge without endotracheal intubation). Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to identify patient characteristics associated with high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and/or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure (endotracheal intubation and/or in-hospital mortality). SETTING: One large academic health system, including five hospitals (one quaternary referral center, a tertiary hospital, and three community hospitals), in New York City. PATIENTS: All hospitalized adults 18-100 years old with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted between March 1, 2020, and April 28, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 331 and 747 patients received high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as the highest level of noninvasive respiratory support, respectively; 154 (46.5%) in the high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula cohort and 167 (22.4%) in the noninvasive positive pressure ventilation cohort were successfully discharged without requiring endotracheal intubation. In adjusted models, significantly increased risk of high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure was seen among patients with cardiovascular disease (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.17-2.83 and subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06-1.84, respectively). Conversely, a higher peripheral blood oxygen saturation to Fio2 ratio at high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation initiation was associated with reduced risk of failure (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.54, and subdistribution hazard ratio 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients receiving noninvasive respiratory modalities for coronavirus disease 2019 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure achieved successful hospital discharge without requiring endotracheal intubation, with lower success rates among those with comorbid cardiovascular disease or more severe hypoxemia. The role of high-flow oxygen delivered through nasal cannula and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure warrants further consideration.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL